Senate president, Bukola Saraki, will on October 19
knows his fate as the Court of Appeal has fixed that date to deliver
judgment in an appeal brought by Saraki against the federal government
challenging the legality of his trial at Code of Conduct (CCT) over
alleged false assets declaration.
The appeal court decision followed the final brief of arguments from counsels to the parties in the suit.
Leading legal mind for Saraki, Joseph Daudu, former
president of the Nigerian Bar Association, Yusuf Ali, Amhed Raji,
Adebayo Adelodun, Mahmud Magaji and Kayode Eleja all Senior Advocates of
Nigeria.
READ ALSO: Why Saraki Defered Ministerial Nominee Screening — Group
Saraki lawyer, Daudu raised five points of arguments bordering on the
legality of the trial of Saraki by the CCT. He stated that the tribunal
erred when it decided to proceed with the trial with just two members
rather than the mandatory three as provided by the constitution,
Leadership reports.
He told the appellate court that the composition of the tribunal run
foul of paragraphs 15(1) of the 1999 constitution by seating with two
members instead of three and asked the court to nullify the CCT
proceedings of last month due to lack of quorum.
READ ALSO: CCB Denies To Disclose Public Officers’ Assets
Daudu disagreed with the submission of the counsel to the federal
government, Rotimi Jacobs that held that Interpretation Act can be used
in resolving the vacuum created by the constitution that is silent on
the quorum for the tribunal membership.
Saraki lawyer insisted that the Interpretation Act cannot override
the constitution been the supreme law and the Act being inferior to the
constitution.
“To ask that the Act of Interpretation be used to override
constitutional provision is wrong and unheard off. That itself will
amount to product of mis-interpretation because constitution is the
supreme law and not an Act,” Daudu argued.
No comments:
Post a Comment